If the conservatives win the general election it will be second time the SNP have deliverd a Conservative government.

The SNP are trying to gloss over the fact that it was them who put Margaret Thatcher into 10 Downing Street and they are trying to pretend that they are not trying to deliver another conservative victory.

A common lie told about the previous referendum was "After the 1979 referendum, Scotland suffered 18 years of Tory rule we didn't vote for …"

The truth is the Scots weren't "given" Tory rule by anyone other than the SNP and if they suffered 18 years of Tory rule, it was because the SNP DID vote with the Tories and actually brought on their long years in power.

Nicola surgeon and the SNP choose to forget and hope that no one will recall, is that it was the 11-strong SNP group in the Commons in 1979 that first tabled the no confidence motion in
Jim Callaghan's Labour government which led to its defeat in that memorable debate three weeks after the devolution referendum.

Margaret Thatcher couldn't be sure of beating Callaghan until she saw that the Nats were on her side and once they had shown their hand, she then tabled her own no confidence motion, which, as leader of the main opposition party, took precedence over that of the SNP. She won by only one vote, with all the Nat MPs voting with her – "turkeys voting for an early Christmas", said not-so Sunny Jim.

SNP maintain the biggest fiction of all – that they had nothing to do with the rise and rise of Margaret Thatcher and puts an end to lie of the SNP being anywhere near the left.

Salmond Budget claims' bluff and bluster' says Miliband

Talking in Clydebank, Mr Miliband said the only folks composing a future Labour Budget would be shadow chancellor Ed Balls and himself.
He included:
Mr Miliband said he was working for a Labour majority.
"Should you hold the equilibrium, then you definitely hold the power," he said. That's patently clear.

But talking to Labour activists on Monday, Mr Miliband said: "Honestly, Alex Salmond is at it again. And it's a mix of bluster and bluff."
Mr Salmond also said on Sunday that he considered a "vote-by-vote arrangement" between a minority Labour government as well as the SNP is the most likely results of the election.
But Mr Miliband said he needed a majority Labour government.
He said: "The only style that I'm really going to be the prime minister altering this state is if you vote Labour. This is the easy choice at this election."

He included: "How other parties determine to vote on the grounds of a Labour Queen's Address is up to them."
As a fresh survey indicated Labour could lose the majority of its own seats north of the edge, Mr Miliband was talking
Mr Miliband also repeated a pledge his party will provide more power for the Scottish Parliament.
He said: "We'll give a home rule bill for Scotland in our first Queen's address. More powers over social security, through occupations, through income tax.
He attacked the strategies of the SNP for complete financial autonomy for Scotland, saying they'd expand austerity north of the border.

 "That means the SNP fight this election still proposing to stop the sharing of resources to the other side of the UK, the rule of redistribution.
"They're campaigning for the ending of the Barnett Formula, replacing it using a reliance on high-risk and unpredictable petroleum revenues - sales which even Nicola Sturgeon acknowledges are astonishingly difficult to call."
Media caption The deputy leader of the SNP says he CAn't comprehend why Ed Miliband was "saying these daft things"
And he said Labour will put a stop to "Tory austerity".
"Tory austerity makes it so much more difficult for us to teach the young," he said. "Tory austerity makes life risky for the old, Tory austerity sabotages our NHS and our essential public services in each and every element of the UK.
'Boost Scotland'
"So we'll put paid once and for all to Tory austerity using a Labour government."
His remarks came as a fresh ICM/Guardian survey indicated Labour faces losing most of its 41 seats in Scotland on 7 May.
"If we're in a status to help we're ready to help a Labour government, but that will come at a cost," he told the BBC's Daily Politics.
"If it's a trust and supply arrangement, we must agree on several stuff at the start.
"It it's a vote-by-vote basis then there should be discussions through the course of the parliament."

Reading Chronicle repeats Hillsborough slur and fakes front page

The Reading Chronicle today has been accused of dishonesty after they wrote a story about hooliganism in which they claimed "Quick thinking stewards prevented a crush at the turnstiles on the 24th Anniversary of the Hillsborough disaster after a crowd of Liverpool supporters began drinking at the entrance to the away end rather than filing into their seats." this is almost exact same slur that police tried to use to cover there involvement in the Hillsborough tragedy they blamed the victim. In addition to this they faked a picture of a "hooligan" for the front page much like Piers Morgan's infamous faked front page for news of the world.  Once again supposedly professional journalists end up looking like writers for The Onion. Are there any honest journalists left?

link to the article

Easy to understand guide to why Scotland is not an EU member.

You (Scotland ) Join a Gym (UK) the Gym has a special deal for its members were they also get membership of a local swimming pool (EU)

If you (Scotland)like the swimming pool but not the gym and you leave the gym (UK)you don't keep the membership of the swimming pool (EU)you have to then apply to be a member of the swimming pool (EU) separately.

Someone is really keen to hide the truth

"Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use." 

As someone has sent a fraudulent cease and decist about this article i have posted it again. Someone really doesn't want you to see the truth.Altough ther e is no Copyrighted work in any of the pictures i thought it best to put in the above disclaimer as google shoot first and ask questions later.

wrote a little piece about tabloid journalists and how they are professional liars and cited @tabloidtroll as an example Well @tabloidtroll blew his top and sent me this little dozy and filled with a few lies but also some correction of lies (should that be admission of the original lie. probably not it's not a direct admission).

Now I have stopped laughing I shall go through point by point. Tabloid trolls very first thing to do is correct my misspelling of illness. Always the sign of someone whose only skill in life is good spelling also a sign that they don't have a legitimate argument. Correction of spelling should always be thought of like Godwin's law. Actually here and now I'm making Sir Humphrey's law if you correct someone's  spelling or grammar during an argument you instantly lose any argument I will let @tabloidtroll off this one as it is new.  Of course the irony is he misspells reporter as reported later on but I knew what he meant and wouldn't normally care if it was misspelled if it wasn't for his own pedantry.
 

It's good to hear the Illness isn't terminal hopefully they stay in remission. Still doesn't reverse the fact that @tabloidtroll lied about @zelo_street claiming that he was mocking cancer no he was mocking a bad journalist who unfortunately suffers from cancer two very different things. But as you can see from the below screenshot @tabloidtroll in a truly sick manner tried to get cancer charities to do his dirt work for him and slander @zelo_street, they all appear to have ignored him.

Next @tabloidtroll claims journalist can't lie for profit since they don't make a profit the publications they work for make the profit. For that statement to be true Journalist would have to work for free there might, might be a few examples of journalists who works for free  but I'm pretty sure the vast majority are either paid for piece work or on a salary. So that is blatant straight up lie by @tabloidtroll. Also the other thing to note from this he doesn't deny that journalist lie just denies they do it for money which isn't true.

His next claim is  "You also forgot -rather blatantly- how the blogger first mocked cancer suffer then a later reported (sic) [reporter] killed abroad." Well he has certainly changed his tune first he claimed that @zelo_street accused this reporter of lying about cancer not true.


 Then when he was held to account about that he claimed that @zelo_street was mocking cancer again not true. finally he now settles on the truth @zelo_street was mocking someone who also happened to have cancer. It took him 3 days or so but he finally rowed back from his lies to the truth. except he then goes on to add the lie that @zelo_street mocked a dead reporter.  Nope, on Zelo Street he asked for someone to send him a picture of Dennis Rice who @zelo_street believes is @tabloidtroll someone sent him a picture which was actually off the late Rupert Hamer once @zelo_street was informed he did the right thing and removed it @tabloidtroll now claims that @zelo_street was mocking the dead. Nope he was mocking Dennis Rice and someone quite possibly you or connected to you sent him a picture of a Journalist who died whilst reporting on the fighting in Afghanistan @zelo_streets only fault was to be to trusting.

Finally @tabloidtroll finishes off with a rant and says I'm blocked. What a shame a liar has blocked me oh dear. Maybe we need a Sir Humphrey's law 2. Blocking someone is an admission that you can't argue against their points and that you are a coward running away from the truth.

@tabloidtroll you are a liar a coward a hypocrite and represent all that is wrong with the British press. You believe you are special and somehow not subject to same levels of decency and morality that everyone else is and now you have set out a mission of disinformation just because some journalists might be held accountable for breaking the law.

From trying to use someone who is suffering from cancer as weapon to lying and then changing the lie as and when you get held to account. You are a sick person and use every underhand trick in the book but the world is changing and the internet allows people the directly challenge your lies and misrepresentations, something that could not happen with print newspaper. Get used to it because your old tricks don't work anymore.

I have added @zelo_street to my links to the right check it out it's an interesting blog and it's the least @zelo_street deserves after being subjected to a shower of shit from @tabloidtroll.