Professional liars in reverse order of dishonesty. @tabloidtroll @zelo_street

4. Sales people and marketers

It is there job to mislead and lie to create sales and a positive image the lowest on the rung of professional liars as there are laws controlling how dishonest they can be.

3.  Politicians

Lying comes as a natural part of the job it has to be done on a almsot daily bassis because if they really said what they though then ordinary people would be able to run succesful political campaigns. They have some restrictions because if the lie is too big and blatant there can sometimes be serious repercussions.

2 political press officers and spin doctors

Same as politicians but with less restrictions on their behaviour as they can give "off the record" and un-attributable quotes.

1 Tabloid Journalists

Utterly devoid of moral behaviour they not only lie for profit but believe that they are somehow special and superior to you and me. Just look at the leveson enquiry you will not see a bigger pit sociopathic self justification "in the public interest". A perfect example is the twitter account @tabloidtroll AKA Dennis Rice who engages in vicious and slanderous campaign against those such as @zelo_street who point out there dishonesty. He is even desperate enough to use someone else's terminal ilness as a "weapon" against @zelo_street its not much of a weapon as @zelo_street never mocked  there ilness, It's just another example of Tabloid journalists special little world that only they inhabit.

Daily mail journalist Threatens to Sue Blogger after being told the truth

Excellent e-mail exchange between James of jdc325.wordpress.com and Sue Reid who writes for softcore Porn publisher  the Daily Mail is trying to spread the lie the MMR jab causes Autism despite the fact that no evidence has ever been provided.  Sue comes across as being slightly unhinged seemingly ignoring what James has written and even going as far as accusing him of being part of "Big Pharma" which is always a sign that someone knows they are wrong and are trying to deflect justified criticism. This especially evident after a later e-mail where she tries to row back from claiming that there is a link between MMR and autism and says that she was merely reporting and not promoting anti MMR.  check out the article for yourself it sheds a light on how bad Journalism in this country  is especially aroundscience and medicine. From the E-mail exchange it is very understandable why she died want this to published and why James did the right thing in publishing it.